Question by there.: What is another way to express this?
Correlation interaction.
One thing moves, and than another thing movies in synchrony with it? For example, a see saw, a mouse and a pointer?
Best answer:
Answer by Jackie
A monkey and a banana.
Add your own answer in the comments!
entanglement?
a change of one is the change of another…
ex.(body’s reaction to touch)
China and the World….lol, it’s kinda true.
hmm…the sun and the moon..i don’t know!!!
hope i sorta helped 🙂
I would say that a conversation is a correlation interaction.
If I say “Good Morning”, I am attempting to interact with you.
If you respond, “Hey, how are ya doin?” you are interacting with me, but correlating your response to my query.
I’m sure this could also be represented chemically, but this is Philosophy, not Chemistry.
😉
I call it the dance of cosmic energy.. and some times it appears to have rhythem…
synchronicity: The state or fact of being synchronous or simultaneous; synchronism.
simultaneousness
The wave:)
tennis
steering wheel, car
Simultaneous correlation…
Parallel correlation…
Corresponding parallels…
I suggest brainstorming with a thesaurus if it is a word you’re actually asking about and looking for.
The concept of Entanglement, however may it be recognised in quantum physics, I think is still farfetched. It is described as some ‘interconnection’ that might exist between two atomic particles placed a very long distance apart, without any apparent causative or physical interlink, which to me at least sound just as farfetched a concept. I do not know either upon what real physical evidence the proof of its existence has been laid, as let alone the case of two particle entangled despite being light years apart, it hard enough to study a single one even under an powerful microscope. The concept nevertheless is there formally there, just to entice the mind to think, to invite it to the possibilities of greater a wonder.
The word I would like to use for this phenomenon is synchronicity, for any such situations of concurrence. Now, here we have something far more tangible for the mind to grasp, a concept that the human mind and the body of human knowledge is not completely unaware of, as it was first described by Swiss Psychologist Carl Gustav Jung in the 1920s as: ‘the experience of two or more events that are apparently causally unrelated occurring together in a meaningful manner. To count as synchronicity, the events should be unlikely to occur together by chance’.
I find this concept, the thought, meaningful to the limits of wonder and intrigue. I think this is not simply a matter of some odd concurrences happening rarely, or as if merely by a trick or chance, but a matter deeply of the fact that all things in the world, in the universe, are inescapably interconnect, interlinked, a parts of a certrain oneness, where however might they seem to be acting individually, if not most obviously causatively linked, they really are not. The example of a pointer and a mouse just is a simple matter of connectivity, of two instances, one physical and the other electronic, in reality being the same thing. This is very much like the instance of a shadow and its cast, a figure and its reflection in a mirror. The entire computer systems would require a virtual interface for our human interaction, or may that be regarded in the future, once the computers would develop a mind of their own, intermeddling, where the nature of the interaction so far is merely one-sided, actively human.
Then there could be instance of interrelations existing at far subtler levels as for instance in most cases of nature: the synchronicity of migrating birds with the seasons, and the one that exists between flowers bearing plants and pollen carrying insects and bees, for instance. I am sure instance are not few and far between but plentiful. One may find things far more amazing and intriguing to the mind if one explored nature just a little deeper. For instance, do pets, like cats and dogs, have premonitory senses? Can some people have psychic abilities to predict the future? Can there be memories in reverse, as of the events yet to take place, as described in the Through the Looking-Glass by Lewis Carol.
Then there is concept of the existence of human collective consciousness. Are we not all like living in syncretic mega-dome of existence? Do we all reflect through our thoughts and actions what all the other people think and do? Then, is there some high reality that our physical reality is synchronised after. What is nature of our relation with the creative force that caused this world, the universe, to be in place? I think, and however generalised it may sound, time is the greatest of all synchronisers, of which all things move in the way of most simplistic, or more or less complex, harmonic pendulums: the planets, the moons, the stars, the galaxies and the entire fashion of the universe. Might there be nothing in the world, as the world, the reality, the physical universe, aside synchronicity on the one side, and what we are beginning to know as quantum chaos?
Some people have hypnotic abilities. It is when they are said to be charismatic, have a presence, or an aura around them. In the arena of public speaking, or stage performance, for instance, some accomplished speakers and performers are able to move, motivate, and inspire people just as much as they themselves are. This has been seen that singers and dancers if invited any person from the audience to the stage that person so entranced would perform just as good. Then there are great rhythms that exist between sports teams and their fans. The instances are virtually endless. I am sure once you begin thinking along these lines, in this rather reassuring manner, you would find that life is full of fascinating coincidences, instances and concurrences. You might develop a whole new way of seeing things.
morphic resonance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Sheldrake