Apr 262014

Question by Sὶℜὶሁᔑ Rℓgℓɳℓrαtℓd: Based on what anthropology evidence do Jews prove they are the descendants of the ancient Hebrews?
Is their any scientific Anthropological evidence proving that modern Jews descend from the ancient Hebrews described in the Old Testament? Besides anything passed down orally or anything which is in written words.
Paper, Why are you mad I am just asking a simple question that passed threw my head. What is the evidence your just claiming. Show me some anthropological evidence.
Paper, your Torah your Tanak show me the evidence. Why can’t you show me scientific evidence. See it only proves your not the people and that your beleiving somthing which has been passed around but no one is forsure.
Now it doesn’t matter. Why everytime some one is question somthing which many who are claiming to be a people can not prove they want to say it doesn’t matter. Whatever
Soda, All your doing is tracing one line from Judah which I can find easy evidence proving that link you sent me is nothing but somthing PHD jews wrote up with thier minds made up besides showing the evidence in the bone structures.

Best answer:

Answer by Paperback Writer Kosher NinjaJPA
How about the fact that Jewish men with the surname ‘Cohen’ have been proven to be directly descended from the brother of Moses – Aaron?

That good enough for ya?

Oh, and by the way: the fact that you actually think the OT is somehow linked to Judaism, really reveals that you don’t understand the Jewish religion at all. You might like to think about that BEFORE you try and challenge us.


SIRIUS – maybe I am a tad fed up with your REPEATED insults against Jews? Day after day after day I have read them.

The big pity is, you actually answer really WELL on many posts that ask about Judaism.

As for ‘proof’, I would suggest that the fact that what I offered here was great – google it if you don’t believe me!

I can cite the Tanakh from now until the Jewish maschiach arrives – but what’s the point? It wouldn’t convince you. Google the studies being done in DNA and Cohen men.

Here is one link:



Try arguing with this, from http://www.simpletoremember.com

The fascinating story of how DNA studies confirm an ancient biblical tradition.

Dr. Karl Skorecki, a Cohen of Eastern European parents, was attending synagogue one morning. The Cohen called up for the Torah reading that morning was a Jew of Sephardic background, whose parents were born in North Africa. Dr. Skorecki looked at the Sephardi Cohen’s physical features and considered his own physical features. They were significantly different in stature, skin coloration and hair and eye color. Yet both had a tradition of being Cohanim, direct descendants of one man — Aaron, the brother of Moses.

Cohanim (plural of Cohen) are the priestly family of the Jewish people, members of the Tribe of Levi. The books of Exodus and Leviticus describe the responsibilities of the Cohanim, which include the Temple service and blessing of the people. The Torah (the first five books of the Bible) describes the anointing of Aaron, the brother of Moses, as the first High Priest (Cohen Gadol).

Jewish tradition, based on the Torah, is that all Cohanim are direct descendants of Aaron, the brother of Moses. The Cohen line is patrilineal — passed from father to son without interruption for 3,300 years, or more than 100 generations.

Dr. Skorecki considered, “According to tradition, this Sephardi Cohen and I have a common ancestor. Could this line have been maintained since Sinai, and throughout the long exile of the Jewish people?” As a scientist, he wondered, could such a claim be tested?

Being a nephrologist and a top-level researcher at the University of Toronto and the Rambam-Technion Medical Center in Haifa, he was involved in the breakthroughs in molecular genetics which are revolutionizing medicine and the study of the life-sciences. He was also aware of the newly developing application of DNA analysis to the study of history and population diversity.

Dr. Skorecki considered a hypothesis: if the Cohanim are descendants of one man, they should have a common set of genetic markers — a common haplotype — that of their common ancestor. In our case, Aaron HaCohen.


A genetic marker is a variation in the nucleotide sequence of the DNA, known as a mutation. Mutations which occur within genes — a part of the DNA which codes for a protein — usually cause a malfunction or disease and is lost due to selection in succeeding generations. However, mutations found in so-called “non-coding regions” of the DNA tend to persist.

Since the Y chromosome consists almost entirely of non-coding DNA (except for the genes determining maleness), it would tend to accumulate mutations. Since it is passed from father to son without recombination, the genetic information on a Y chromosome of a man living today is basically the same as that of his ancient male ancestors, except for the rare mutations that occur along the hereditary line.

A combination of these neutral mutations, known as a haplotype, can serve as a genetic signature of a man’s male ancestry. Maternal genealogies are also being studied by means of the m-DNA (mitrocondrial DNA), which is inherited only from the mother.


Dr. Skorecki made contact with Professor Michael Hammer, of the University of Arizona, a leading researcher in molecular genetics and a pioneer in Y chromosome research. Professor Hammer uses DNA analysis to study the history of populations, their origins and migrations. His previous research included work on the origins of the Native American Indians and the development of the Japanese people.

A study was undertaken to test the hypothesis. If there were a common ancestor, the Cohanim should have common genetic markers at a higher frequency than the general Jewish population.

In the first study, as reported in the prestigious British science journal, Nature (January 2, 1997), 188 Jewish males were asked to contribute some cheek cells from which their DNA was extracted for study. Participants from Israel, England and North America were asked to identify whether they were a Cohen, Levi or Israelite, and to identify their family background.

The results of the analysis of the Y chromosome markers of the Cohanim and non-Cohanim were indeed significant. A particular marker, (YAP-) was detected in 98.5 percent of the Cohanim, and in a significantly lower percentage of non-Cohanim.


In a second study, Dr. Skorecki and associates gathered more DNA samples and expanded their selection of Y chromosome markers. Solidifying their hypothesis of the Cohens’ common ancestor, they found that a particular array of six chromosomal markers was found in 97 of the 106 Cohens tested. This collection of markers has come to be known as the Cohen Modal Hapoltype (CMH) — the standard genetic signature of the Jewish priestly family. The chances of these findings happening at random is greater than one in 10,000.

The finding of a common set of genetic markers in both Ashkenazi and Sephardi Cohanim worldwide clearly indicates an origin pre-dating the separate development of the two communities around 1000 CE. Date calculation based on the variation of the mutations among Cohanim today yields a time frame of 106 generations from the ancestral founder of the line, some 3,300 years — the approximate time of the Exodus from Egypt, the lifetime of Aaron HaCohen.

Professor Hammer was recently in Israel for the Jewish Genome Conference. He confirmed that his findings are consistent — over 80 percent of self-identified Cohanim have a common set of markers.

The finding that less than one-third of the non-Cohen Jews who were tested possess these markers is not surprising to the geneticists. Jewishness is not defined genetically. Other Y-chromosomes can enter the Jewish gene pool through conversion or through a non-Jewish father. Jewish status is determined by the mother. Tribe membership follows the father’s line.


Calculations based on the high rate of genetic similarity of today’s Cohanim resulted in the highest “paternity-certainty” rate ever recorded in population genetics studies — a scientific testimony to family faithfulness.

Stated Dr. David Goldstein of Oxford University:

“For more than 90 percent of the Cohens to share the same genetic markers after such a period of time is a testament to the devotion of the wives of the Cohens over the years. Even a low rate of infidelity would have dramatically lowered the percentage.”

[Science News, October 3, 1998]

Wider genetic studies of diverse present day Jewish communities show a remarkable genetic cohesiveness. Jews from Iran, Iraq, Yemen, North Africa and European Ashkenazim all cluster together with other Semitic groups, with their origin in the Middle East. A common geographical original can be seen for all mainstream Jewish groups studied.

This genetic research has clearly refuted the libel that the Ashkenazi Jews are not related to the ancient Hebrews, but are descendants of the Kuzar tribe — a pre-10th century Turko-Asian empire which reportedly converted en masse to Judaism. Researchers compared the DNA signature of the Ashkenazi Jews against those of Turkish-derived people, and found no correspondence.


In their second published paper in Nature (July 9, 1998) the researchers included an unexpected finding. Those Jews in the study who identified themselves as Levites did not show a common set of markers as did the Cohanim. The Levites clustered in three groupings, one of them the CMH. According to tradition, the Levites should also show a genetic signature from a common paternal patrilineal ancestor. The researchers are now focusing effort on the study of Levites’ genetic make up to learn more about their history in the Diaspora.

Using the CMH as a DNA signature of the ancient Hebrews, researchers are pursuing a hunt for Jewish genes around the world.

This could have ramifications in the search for the Biblical Ten Lost Tribes.

Using the genetic markers of the Cohanim as a yardstick, these genetic archaeologists are using DNA research to discover historical links to the Jewish people.

The researchers’ policy is that the research is not a test of individuals, but an examination of the extended family. Having the CMH is not a proof of one’s being a Cohen, for the mother’s side is also significant in determining one’s Cohen status. At present, there are no ramifications in Jewish law due to this discovery. No one is certified nor disqualified because of their Y chromosome markers.

The research has shown a clear genetic relationship amongst Cohanim and their direct lineage from a common ancestor. The resea

Give your answer to this question below!

Apr 262012

Question by : What is it with people trying to use “Physics and Science” to prove their Gods existence?
Especially the Laws of Thermodynamics… they are always so cocky about it, they think they understand them and yet they so obviously don’t.

I thought it was a central part of their beliefs that faith should be enough.

You could say it’s both.

Best answer:

Answer by gutbucket
It is simply lying to those who know nothing about science.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Dec 172011

Question by : How can you prove that your religion is true when there are so many others what makes your religion real/true?
I just want to know, how can you prove that there is a superior being among us, Whats makes you believe that your religion is the truth. Also if you were raised on another religion wouldn’t you believe that religion instead?

Best answer:

Answer by Matt Portnoy
You just have to have faith that yours is right.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Dec 052011

Question by Fester: How can Scientific Method be used to disprove Astrology if it cannot be used to prove what is phenomenal?
Reading through articles about astrology and its validity leads me to a question. How can Scientific Method be used to disprove Astrology if it cannot be used to prove what is phenomenal? Ghosts, weeping Jesus statues, demonic possession and many other things supernatural.

Best answer:

Answer by Venus is a Fly Trap
It cant, its a concept, theory, thought, belief, its much like people say they believe or dont in religion due to facts for or against it. faith feeds religion and creates belief, same for astrology there are things some feel prove astrology and there are things others say disprove astrology. either way there isnt a solid enough proof or foundation to say anything as a fact, instead it faith and personal veiwpoints that make it something you believe in or do not. its completely personal because you could find info to fight for or against but its all subjective so science cant make it a fact or fiction.

Give your answer to this question below!

Sep 152011

Question by Dr. Mankitten: Christian: how can you prove Deists wrong?
How can you know whether God is still around us, or He designed and created the universe and left it working under the laws of physics and doesn’t intervene anymore in our lives. You have admit at least this alternative is completely plausible. And what people feel to be God are some altered states of consciousness and theory of mind interpreted as God’s presence.

Best answer:

No it’s not, this “alternative” is a nigh on impossibility.

I don’t have to check under every childs pillow in the whole world to see that the tooth fairy doesn’t exist in the same way as me not having to listen to hearsay and anecdotes to know that god doesnt exist.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Sep 102011
Physics and Consciousness
by j-No

Question by Flying Grok: How do you measure your soul ? Prove it exists ?
…and someone will surely come up with early XX century experience with some doctors killing dogs and checking their weight before and after death, and trying the same with humans.
His balance was not good, and he came up with the ridiculous idea that the soul weighs 20g.

And the funny thing, some people believed that !

Seriously folks…how do you measure the soul ?
How do you prove it exists, seeing that all consciousness, emotions, memory, instincts, altruism, … have been explained successfully using biology, physics, and NOT theology or spiritual dimension blablablabla… ?
Lion of the tribe, I invite you to check some books. Research is not hypothetical.
Studying brain-damaged people, making scans of people brain while asking them to think of something,
studying animals behavior, studying toddlers, … have produced a mass of information.

I recommend easy-to-read book by Steven Pinker, Noam Chomsky, Jarod Diamond, to start learning on this.
@Weifmester, if it looks like a duck, smell like a duck, sounds like a duck…a duck then ?
if a billion people believe a stupid thing, it does not make it true !
What makes it true ? Proof that it is true !

People believe you had to leech away disease from people blood to get them better. True, the few people who survived the treatment, were fine. The others died.
Lots of people believe in sugar pills healing them ( homeopathy ), it does not make it a serious way to heal people ( just a good way to make money ).
so… a summary…you prove a soul exist by 1)redefining the word 2)saying other people believe in it 3)quoting bible

…can you do a bit better ?

Best answer:

Answer by Lion of the tribe
you can’t measure consciousness

biological and physics explanation for consciousness, emotions, memory, etc are hypothetical

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Aug 082011

Question by world1: How can I prove that Monism is nothing but an illusion of our minds?
How can I prove to a Monist that he’s living in an illusion. Monists believe that monism is absolutely real and they are living in monism, non dual world, non duality. They do believe this 100%.
How can I prove them that this is only an illusion.

Best answer:

Answer by Jake
By proving nothing is something. Good luck with that.

What do you think? Answer below!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers