Nov 182010
 

Alan Watt continues to divulge his fascinating in-depth insights into how culture is created from the top down and used by the elite to manipulate and pervert natural human instincts towards their own ends. Every change in culture, right down to fashion and music, points out Watt citing Plato, had to be authorized and promoted from the top. This science of mass mind control is still taught today by the insiders and mediums such as television are used as weapons of social control to prevent humanity from ever realizing its full potential. Watt talks about how the elite technocrats plan for the long term, in 50, 100 and even 150 year cycles in which to implement the different aspects of their agenda, and how each cultural shift was deliberately timed to be implemented at a certain time. The current cultural bombardment surrounds the emergence of neo-eugenics, with big foundations and organizations like the Optimum Population Trust pushing the idea that humans are superfluous, virus-like, and therefore worthless. Watt discusses how sperm counts across Europe and America have dropped at an alarming rate of up to 80 per cent over the past 50 years, and how the media’s complete ignorance of this crisis proves that it was authorized as a deliberate program of de-population. Watt traces the program back to its origins in the 1950′s, where synthetic female hormones like estrogen were put in baby foods by companies like Proctor and Gamble, as well as baby milk bottles washed with
Video Rating: 4 / 5

A clip from the new unreleased feature film “The Pack” directed by Alyssa Rallo Bennett, where addiction, love and murder are burning issues. “The Pack” is the riveting tale of how second-hand smoke destroys a family and divides a nation. “The Pack” has its finger on the pulse of the America and where people stand regarding this major social issue plaguing our country. Times change and any of us can get caught in the cultural shift of our nation. “The Pack” asks the searing question: “What if your behavior was legally accepted for dozens of years and all of a sudden it came into question?” Written by Alyssa & Gary O. Bennett of Electric Movies & Jamaad Productions the film stars Lucie Arnaz Molly Culver Tibor Feldman Adam Ferrara Dan Frazier Zach Galligan Ryan Homchick David Laundra Carlos Leon Angie Martinez Elisabeth Moss Roger Robinson “The Pack” is a powerful dramatic story about second-hand smoke and personal responsibility inspired by real life stories and documented cases where secondhand smoke is believed to be the cause of a loved ones death. In “The Pack”, an ambitious Assistant District Attorney (Carlos Leon) prosecutes a wife and mother (Lucie Arnaz) on three counts of murder after her forty-seven year old husband (Scott Bryce) dies of lung cancer from breathing her second-hand smoke for thirty years. In a wrenching twist, it turns out that the Assistant DA is acting at the request of the couple’s twenty-year-old son (Ryan Homchick) who is mourning the loss of
Video Rating: 1 / 5

  25 Responses to “Alan Watt: The Neo-Eugenics War On Humanity 4/4”

  1. Excellent observer on who is in control of the world and how they use the people for their own selfish needs. I love the outdoors scenery background as Alan Watt speaks to us.

  2. the one thing i don’t understand is that the elite make it illegal to commit suicide. wtf?? they don’t care about us & wish us dead, yet, hate it if we did it ourselves. what if we wanted to help them out and we voluntarily wanted to go to a fema camp and die in the gas chamber? put me to sleep and then OUT

    truthknowledge. com

  3. Benjamin Franklin
    Also considered Germans
    A “swarthy people”

  4. @susieham

    I love how you put in the bible-quote. That explains a lot.

  5. @susieham

    No i won’t/ Look up Dunning-Krueger syndrome. Then try the solution. Ed-u-ca-tion.

  6. @mariatechnosux

    You didn’t read to well if you think HPV is only transmitted sexually and can be prevented by using a condom.
    Again, what eugenics? Every cure, vaccine, treatment ever devised by scientists is a direct willing violation of natural selection.

  7. @SSTTEEAALLTTHH The point is that you are accusing us of being uninformed, refusing to consult mainstream sources, only bothering with conspiracy theories. I have shown you that, where we *can* (I’ve demonstrated that you scientists hoard information), we have already consulted mainstream sources, and have reached our own conclusions, which are not the conclusions the mainstream wants us to reach. My conclusion is that the NWO eugenics agenda conspiracy theory has a whole lot of merit to it.

  8. @SSTTEEAALLTTHH Let’s see, you chide Youtube users telling them: “Do you expect me to educate you on the subject over a YT video thread”, yet you expect ME to post my full reading-list over a YT thread? I just gave you one example of the kind of research I’ve been reading. Clearly you don’t get the hint.

  9. @mariatechnosux

    You read 2 peer-reviewed articles and you think you are an expert on HPV, vaccination and immunology? You called HPV a disease that could only be transferred sexually and be prevented by using a condom. So yes, you are not really what i would call educated on the subject of HPV and resulting cancers.

  10. @jmurrayrocks, Nice thought with one drawback…
    Every time someone ‘takes out’ the ‘controller’, a thousand others step in their place. One example that comes to mind is Pablo Escobar.
    Really no solution to this that I can think of, It’s just the nature of man.

  11. @afro208,
    Why? Flies do and it’s not a problem.
    Nature is dominant and mans ego blinds him.

  12. @mariatechnosux: Actually, I believe it was “edumication”; although, I think I like your version better…very astute of you. ;)

  13. @SSTTEEAALLTTHH ” Pathology isn’t really your thing, that’s clear by now.” Suuure, sure, and that’s cos I’ve only read fluffy conspiracy theory texts on HPV, such as Jeanne M. Marrazzo, Laura A. Koutsky, Kathleen L. Stine, et al., “Genital Human Papillomavirus in Women Who Have Sex With Women”, Journal of Infectious Disease Diseases, vol. 178, 1604-09, 1998. Clearly I’m uniformed and don’t know what the hell I’m on about :-D

  14. @RandyBful1 I just love this new term you’ve coined, “edumination”, a combination of the term “illumination” (or maybe even “abomination”) and “education” to indicate NWO sanctioned brainwashiing in schools! I’m gonna have to steal that one!

  15. Makes me wonder if we will ever truly know freedom. Life is what we make it? I’d like it to be free from oppression by anybody.I wonder what the human race will evolve into? What is the meaning of life? Does anybody really know the answer?
    Tomorrow is another day.

  16. I get the feeling that Stealth is Bias towards the Pharmacudical Companies. He sounds more like a Spokesman than just your average Opinionated person.

  17. @LibertyTruthJustice

    And i don’t know where you get the idea that a virus which at least 80% of females will have encountered before the age of 50 has a low prevalence.

  18. @LibertyTruthJustice

    If you are not feeling well after the first shot of a vaccine, you don’t have to take the second and third (and sometimes fourth) by the way, just like it says on every PIL of every drug to immediately stop taking the drugs at any sign of discomfort other than the expected effects (such as fatigue mostly) and contact your physician to ask for further advice. Why would we do this if we we’re trying to poison people?

  19. @LibertyTruthJustice

    I am aware of the stories surrounding Gardasil, as there are stories for Cervarix, HBV vaccines, polio vaccines, rubella vaccines, tetanus-shots, HBA vaccines, and virtually ever other vaccine ever developed. All vaccines that have undoubtedly saved countless lives and contrary to conspiracy theorists and religious nuts showed no correlation with any of the adverse effects claims in actual peer-reviewed articles.

  20. @LibertyTruthJustice

    Gardasil and cervarix can, like any vaccine, evoke an over-elaborate immune response in some people, but so can any drug. You don’t know that kind of stuff in advance.No drug is safe for everyone to use, but i can assure you quality checks are being done to the vaccines and drugs that leave and it doesn’t take much for them to be revoked or at least publicly discredited.

  21. @LibertyTruthJustice

    Multiple mechanisms such as ADAR’s deal with free genomic material in the cell. When you don’t inject any integrase with full strands or ADAR-inhibitors the risk of developing a tumor from the small amount of fragmented genome that remains in a vaccine is abysmal.

  22. @LibertyTruthJustice

    There is little residual DNA/RNA in vaccines when properly prepared, not to mention these strands are lysated. Fragments of DNA/RNA can’t do any damage in the aren’t inserted into cells with the accompanying viral/bacterial proteins. If transfecting cells was that easy, we wouldn’t have to spend more time perfecting actual carriers and transfectors than actually developing gene therapies.

  23. @SSTTEEAALLTTHH

    And yes, cancer is an horrible condition, and that is why people should beware of vaccines; since vaccine solutions for most vaccines are filled with carcinogenic substances, from all the residual RNA/DNA coming from the celular tissues where vaccine is grown.
    Sadly, people only tend to know about Salk’s issue with the SV40 and other simian viruses. Unfortunately most vaccine preparations are teeming with carcinogens.

  24. @SSTTEEAALLTTHH
    I mentioned prevalence only in reference to the comparative sensacionalism that is promoted by governments and big pharma on what regards HPV. It isn’t that widespread and it isn’t that dangerous. But it shows how propaganda machines can create virtual monsters out of thin air.

    Anyway, I wouldn’t be against an HPV vaccine if it had any assurance of quality or safety. And that just isn’t the case with Gardasil and Cervarix, as the creator of Gardasil herself later came to admit.

  25. @mariatechnosux

    It’s not my fear. The only thing publishers do before we bring in an article is make it understandable. If the person who did that research reads his own article in a review and it’s altered in anyway all hell will brake loose, trusts me, professors and doctors can be pretty confectionist when it comes to their reviews.
    I didn’t say “you” (whoever you meant by that) are all worthless morons. But yes, many people are morons.

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by Yahoo! Answers